|Title||Economizer system cost effectiveness: Accounting for the influence of ventilation rate on sick leave|
|Publication Type||Conference Proceedings|
|Year of Publication||2003|
|Authors||William J Fisk, Olli Seppänen, David Faulkner, Yu Joe Huang|
|Conference Name||Proceedings of the Healthy Buildings 2003 Conference, December 7-11, 2003|
|Publisher||Healthy Buildings 2003, Inc., Singapore|
This study estimated the health, energy, and economic benefits of an economizer ventilation control system that increases outside air supply during mild weather to save energy. A model of the influence of ventilation rate on airborne transmission of respiratory illnesses was used to extend the limited data relating ventilation rate with illness and sick leave. An energy simulation model calculated ventilation rates and energy use versus time for an office building in Washington, D.C. with fixed minimum outdoor air supply rates, with and without an economiser. Sick leave rates were estimated with the disease transmission model. In the modelled 72-person office building, our analyses indicate that the economizer reduces energy costs by approximately $2000 and, in addition, reduces sick leave. The financial benefit of the decrease in sick leave is estimated to be between $6,000 and $16,000. This modelling suggests that economizers are much more cost effective than currently recognized.